标题: |
肝细胞癌伴微血管侵犯诊断和治疗中国专家共识(2024年版) |
title: |
Chinese expert consensus on diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with microvascular invasion(2024) |
版本: |
原创版 |
version: |
Original |
分类: |
专家共识 |
classification: |
Experts consensus |
领域: |
诊疗 |
field: |
Diagnosis and Treatment |
国家和地区: |
中国 |
Country and
region:
|
China |
指南使用者: |
各等级医院从事肝癌相关工作的临床医师、技术人员及相关教学、科研工作人员 |
Guide users:
|
Clinicians, technicians and related teaching and research staff engaged in liver cancer related work in hospitals of all levels |
证据分级方法: |
Ia 证据源于对多项随机对照研究的Meta分析结果
Ib 证据源于至少一项设计良好的随机对照研究结果
IIa 证据源于至少一项设计良好的前瞻性非随机对照研究结果
IIb 证据源自至少一项设计良好的其他类型干预性临床研究结果
III 证据源于设计良好的非干预性研究,如描述性研究,相关性研究等
IV 证据源于专家委员会报告或权威专家的临床经验报道 |
Evidence grading
method:
|
Ia Evidences are originated from the meta-analysis results of various RCTs
Ib Evidences are originated from the results of at least one well-designed RCT
IIa Evidences are originated from the results of at least one well-designed perspective non-RCT
IIb Evidences are originated from the results of at least one well-designed interventional clinical research of other type
III Evidences are originated from the well-designed non-interventional clinical researches, such as descriptive researches and relevant researches
IV Evidences are originated from the reports made by committee of experts or the clinical reports of authoritative experts |
制定单位: |
中国医师协会肝癌专业委员会 |
Formulating unit: |
Chinese Association of Liver Cancer(CALC) and Chinese Medical Doctor Association(CMDA) |
注册时间: |
2024-01-18 |
Registration time: |
注册编号: |
PREPARE-2024CN185 |
Registration number: |
指南制订的目的: |
目前国际上对于MVI的诊断、分型、预测及治疗仍存在较多争议,尚未达成共识。中国医师协会肝癌专业委员会基于现有的循证医学证据,尤其是我国学者针对肝癌伴MVI取得的临床研究成果,经共识委员会成员反复讨论,形成本共识。 |
Purpose of the guideline:
|
At present, there are still many controversies on the diagnosis, classification, prediction and treatment of MVI, and no consensus has been reached. Based on the existing evidence-based medical evidence, especially the clinical research results of Chinese scholars on HCC with MVI, the CALC reached this consensus after repeated discussion by members of the CALC. |