内镜辅助后入路腰椎管狭窄减压手术专家共识(2022)

标题: 内镜辅助后入路腰椎管狭窄减压手术专家共识(2022)
title: Experts Consensus on Endoscopic Posterior Lumbar Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis (2022)
版本: 原创版
version: Original
分类: 专家共识
classification: Experts consensus
领域: 治疗
field: Treatment
国家和地区: 中国
Country and region: China
指南使用者: 脊柱外科医师
Guide users: Spine surgeons
证据分级方法: 2011版牛静循证医学证据等级(OCEBM)
Evidence grading method: 2011 Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM) Levels of Evidence
制定单位: 北京医学会骨科分会微创学组;首都医科大学骨外科学系微创学组
Formulating unit: Minimally Invasive Group, Orthopedic Branch of Beijing Medical Association; Minimally Invasive Group, Department of Orthopedics Surgery, Capital Medical University
注册时间: 2022-11-13
Registration time:
注册编号: PREPARE-2022CN725
Registration number:
指南制订的目的: 腰椎管狭窄症(Lumbar spinal stenosis,LSS)是由于先天或后天等各种因素所致的椎管容积改变,进而引起腰椎神经组织受压及血液循环障碍,出现以臀部或下肢疼痛、神经源性跛行、伴或不伴腰痛等主要临床症状。LSS的手术治疗适用于症状严重超过3-6个月,经保守治疗效果欠佳的患者,开放椎管减压联合/不联合固定融合手术是治疗LSS的经典术式。近年来,随着脊柱微创外科技术的发展,以椎间盘镜(Microendoscopy,MED)、单通道水介质内镜(Uniportal Endoscopic Spinal Surgery,UESS)、双通道水介质内镜(Biportal Endoscopic Spinal Surgery,BESS;Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy,UBE)为代表的内镜辅助后入路椎管减压技术(Endoscopic Posterior Lumbar Decompression,EPLD)被应用于LSS的临床治疗中,展现出良好的效果与技术优势。但是,由于术者对内镜辅助后入路腰椎管狭窄减压手术的掌握水平不同,对手术适应症与禁忌症把握不严格,以及对围术期管理不规范等原因,导致部分LSS患者接受内镜辅助后入路腰椎管狭窄减压手术后临床效果欠佳、出现并发症等情况时有发生。因此,本专家共识通过制定内镜辅助后入路腰椎管狭窄减压手术的相关基本规范,旨在指导脊柱外科医师合理、规范的开展脊柱内镜微创技术,进一步提升LSS患者接受脊柱内镜微创手术的临床疗效。
Purpose of the guideline: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is due to congenital or acquired and other factors causing changes in the volume of the spinal canal, resulting in lumbar nerve tissue compression and blood circulation disorders, presenting clinical symptoms of hip or lower limb pain, neurogenic claudication, with or without lumbar pain. Surgical treatment of LSS is suitable for patients with severe symptoms for more than 3-6 months and poor effect of conservative treatment. Open decompression with/without internal fixation and fusion is the classic operation for the treatment of LSS. In recent years, with the development of minimally invasive spinal surgery technology, endoscopic posterior lumbar decompression (EPLD) represented by microendoscopy (MED), uniportal endoscopic spinal surgery, UESS), and biportal endoscopic spinal surgery (BESS)/ unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) has been applied in the treatment of LSS, showing satisfactory outcome and technical advantage. However, due to the different levels of surgeons' grasp of EPLD for LSS, the lack of strict grasp of surgical indications and contraindications, and the non-standard perioperative management, some LSS patients experienced poor clinical results and complications after EPLD surgery. Therefore, our experts’ consensus aims to develop basic norms related to EPLD for LSS, to guide spinal surgeons to carry out EPLD in a reasonable and standard way, further improving the clinical efficacy of LSS patients receiving minimally invasive spinal endoscopic surgery.